Bygones
i_love_truffle
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit i_love_truffle's Xanga Site!

Name: Dennis
Birthday: 11/16/1984
Gender: Male


Industry: Media


Message: message me
MSN: dennis1116hk@yahoo.com.hk


Member Since: 5/10/2005

SubscriptionsSites I Read

Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site

Sunday, December 30, 2007

Atonement_

Really well-plotted.


Wednesday, December 26, 2007

In humungous praise of holidays (FT 24 Dec 2007)

- Man Does Not Live by Productivity Alone

According to tradition, a British Christmas should look something like this. Stockings, early morning church service, brisk walk, then presents by the tree. Early evening drinks, dinner featuring turkey (or goose, if you want to be different) – followed by tipsy carol-singing around the piano, with roaring fire in the background.

In reality, the average British Christmas is more like this. Woken up by children clamouring for presents; force them to play computer games for a couple of hours, while attempting to sleep off hangover; get up late and shove turkey into oven (it’s not properly de-frosted, but we’ll risk it); open all presents immediately because children are being a nightmare; start drinking well before lunch, something Christmassy like Malibu. Huge, revolting turkey lunch, “with all the trimmings”. Go to shopping mall after lunch, because the sales have already started. Come back, pass out in front of the television.

At every time of the year – bar Christmas – the Financial Times would be all in favour of anything that increases productivity and wealth creation. This newspaper approves of enterprise and business. It likes people who get into the office early – who give 110 per cent, who go the extra mile, who are relentlessly creovative. We know that true fulfilment is not to be found by falling asleep, half-drunk, in front of a rerun of the Great Escape.

It is also true that there is a direct link between the sluggish state of the European economy and the natives’ propensity for taking humungous amounts of holiday. The average American takes just 14 days holiday a year. By contrast, the average Italian takes 42 days off every year and the average Frenchman takes 37 days (and only works 35 hours a week, when he deigns to turn up at the office.) When they are actually at their desks or lathes, the average European produces more per hour than the average American. But because they spend relatively little time working, European productivity per person is well behind that of the Americans.

But maybe Europeans like it that way – and maybe they have a point. There is a whole school of happiness theorists who have been arguing for ages that – beyond a certain point – increased wealth does not seem to translate into increased happiness. Another school of economists has argued that Europe’s relatively slow growth reflects a “preference for leisure”. Europeans have simply worked out that more work and more money do not necessarily translate into greater happiness. So rather than working harder to earn more money, they have chosen to take holiday instead of pay. All perfectly rational, really.

Unfortunately, there are plenty of holes in this theory. It seems unlikely that the great armies of unemployed in continental Europe have actually chosen idleness. Most of them would prefer a job. Even if Europeans do have a “preference for leisure”, this preference is not necessarily wise or sustainable. Low productivity and low growth have social and economic consequences. European political and economic power dwindles away; pension systems become harder to fund.

One man who is fascinated by the problem of raising European productivity is Gordon Brown, Britain’s prime minister. He himself can certainly not be accused of slacking. This summer Mr Brown managed to take exactly one day off, before cancelling his vacation and returning to 10 Downing Street to deal with some now forgotten crisis.

But this festive season we believe that Mr Brown should set aside his otherwise laudable obsession with productivity. He should set an example to the nation by taking two whole days off – not just Christmas, but Boxing Day as well. For 48 hours he should speak to no officials and read no improving works on labour-market flexibility or the future of the International Monetary Fund. As the son of a clergyman, he is allowed to go to church. In all other respects he should immerse himself in the life of the nation – which involves dedicating himself to eating, drinking, opening presents, watching television and fighting with his relatives. Productivity has its place. But a healthy economy also needs conspicuous consumption – and Christmas is the time for that.


Wednesday, December 19, 2007

主稿 - 安踏體育明年增500銷售點 (信報 18-12-2007)

1993年,中國申奧失敗,但同時一個運動用品巨擘正悄悄崛起。「我看到的不是運動帶來的商機,而是市場上的機會。」安踏體育(2020)主席兼首席執行官丁志忠首次接受香港傳媒訪問時說。

 

周日早上,身穿自家品牌、深色運動套裝的丁志忠表示,訪問完成後有關於重大收購的會議。他透露,對象是一個走高端路線的國際大品牌,能和安踏的大眾定位形成互補;合作模式方面,安踏將購入該品牌的內地代理權,而不會成為策略股東。

 

安踏今年七月於本港上市,目前市值逾240億元(人民幣.下同),晉身全球體育用品企業第6位,上半年營業額達15億元,激增逾2倍;純利2億元,升近3倍。

 

根據體育戰略策劃機構前銳(上海)商務諮詢有限公司的研究報告,2008年奧運,中國運動用品市場將高達62億美元。「奧運不單帶動一年的銷售增長」丁志忠分析指出:「對我們最大的幫助是,它提升了整個市場的認知。」  

 

北京奧運的官方贊助資格由Adidas奪得,而安踏則採取「側擊」戰術。安踏沿用一貫起用未成名運動員的策略,冀運動員走紅時將品牌一併帶旺,至今已跟十多名奧運選手簽約代言。此外,安踏計劃大幅增加銷售點,由目前的4,700個,增加至明年5,200個,其中300個新增點將位於主要城市。他估計,明年宣傳開支佔集團收入的15-16%,較往年的高2-3個百分點。

 

中低端客群是安踏的「主場」。其運動鞋平均售價$200一雙,最貴的亦只是$500左右,較Nike和Adidas的平一半。在營銷網絡方面,根據集團的年報,二線城市佔48%;一線和三線的各佔28%和24%。

 

目前安踏於內地市佔率為4%,落後於Nike(16.7%)、Adidas(15.6%)及香港掛牌的李寧(2331)(10.5%),而中國動向(3818)代理的Kappa則佔2.8%。但以淨利潤計算,安踏則領先同類。安踏目前日均產鞋量介乎2,300至2,500雙,目標是5,600雙。

 

奧運過後,安踏計劃於09年「搶攻」童裝系列,並在內地主要城市的步行街擴大份額。

 

20年前用$1,000買了600雙運動鞋到北京創業,到今天坐擁逾百億身家,擔任奧運火炬手的丁志忠說:「每一枚(金牌)都得來不易。」■

 

 

副稿 - 晉江佔世界球鞋產量35%

距離廈門九十公里的晉江約六百平方公里,有超過三百六十家鞋廠,佔全球運動鞋生產量35%,是名副其實的「鞋都」。

 

除了安踏,該市亦是一眾內地運動品牌包括喜得龍、喬丹、金萊克及新加坡上市的鴻星爾克的基地。晉江的發展歷史可追溯至上世紀八十年代,Nike 1985年首次於內地設廠,選址正是晉江,但其後逐漸將生產線移到其他城市和東南亞國家,到90年代中已差不多完全撤出,遺留下來的工廠、生產設備、勞工及技術造就日後一眾鞋企的冒起。

 

根據今年第七屆全國縣域經濟基本競爭力百強縣(市),晉江排名第6,為福建省首位。該市市長李健輝更於早前表示,2010年前,晉江要達到20家企業上市的目標■


Thursday, November 29, 2007

The only thing you can depend on is yourself.


Wednesday, November 21, 2007

lionsforlambs

A gripping political satire with three sophisticated A-listers.

A must-watch.



Next 5 >>